Design Optimization of Hydraulic Penstock
Design optimization is the selection of most efficient and cost effective diameter of Penstock, taking in to account its cost and benefits. Optimization is the application of mathematical tools and techniques to an engineering sector that will enable the concerned people to select the most optimum option. In hydropower projects optimization plays a vital role by increasing project efficiency at least cost.
OPTIMIZATION
Optimization is complicated process for which the project is evaluated for different available discharges , the corresponding project cost and net benefits are compared, the discharge that gives the maximum net benefits at minimum project cost is taken as the Design Discharge and the whole design calculations is made on this discharge.
Trail Diameter No 1
Trail Diameter No 2 & so on..
PENSTOCK OPTIMIZATION EXAMPLE
Penstock is one of the most expensive component of hydropower project and needs to be designed carefully, in this example the unit rates assumed for optimization are best applicable in Pakistan, however for other areas it can be assumed accordingly, while the rest of procedure remains the same.
Let’s suppose a design discharge of 20 cumecs is delivered by a mild steel penstock of length 320m to the hydraulic turbines. The penstock is buried in soil with a gross head of 200m. Seven pipes of diameter 0.9m, 1.0m, 1.10m, 1.2m, 1.35m, 1.5m and 1.8m are considered for optimization, rest of design calculations is given below (assume any missing data)
BASIC INPUT DATA
Material of Pipe 
Mild Steel 


Pipe Diameter (inner) 
Di_{ =} 
1.8 
m 
Head loss due to friction 
H_{f =} 
6.9 
m 
Length of Penstock 
L = 
320 
m 
Flow through Pipe 
Q = 
20 
m3 / s 
Number of pipes 
N = 
1 
no 
Flow per Pipe 
Q/N = 
20 
m3 / s 
Gross Head 
H_{g} = 
200 
m 
Number of Bends 
No = 
3 
no 
Duration 
t = 
24 
hr 
Manning's coefficient 
n = 
0.011 
contt 
Corrosion allowance 
C_{a =} 
1.5 
mm 
Efficiency (Turbine & Powerhouse) 
η = 
85 
% 
LOSSES CALCULATIONS
Entry+Exit+ Gate valve Losse (0.2*V2/2g) 
2 
1.25 
m 
Bend loss Assumed (0.3*V2/2g) 
2 
1.88 
m 
Trash Rack Losses (0.25*V2/2g) 
1 
0.78 
m 
HYDRAULIC DESIGN CALCULATIONS
Area of cross section of the pipe 
A_{p =} 
2.54 
m^{2} 
Wetted permeter 
P = 
5.65 
m 
Hydraulic Radius 
R = 
0.45 
m 
H_{f }in terms of V^{2 } (n^{2} x L/ R^{4/3 }) 
V = 
0.11 
m/s 
Velocity of the flow through the pipe 
V_{p = } 
7.87 
m/s 
Calculated Discharge 
Q _{final =} 
20.09 
m^{3}/s 
Losses calculations 
H_{c =} 
3.93 
m 
Total head loss 
H _{loss =} 
10.87 
m 
Net head 
H _{Net =} 
189.13 
m 
Power 
P_{o}_{ =} 
31.68 
MW 
DESIGN OPTIMIZATION TABLE
From the above calculations it is concluded that the most optimal diameter for the given data is 1.8m with Net power out of 31.68 MW and Net optimized revenue of Rs: 1564.78 Million.
Comments
Agen Bola
Thank you a bunch for sharing this with all of us you actually realize what you are talking about! Bookmarked. Please also seek advice from my site =). We could have a hyperlink change contract between us!
Agen Sbobet